The short answer

Abandonment rate is both a quality metric and a regulatory one. In predictive dialling it counts calls a recipient answers only to find silence, which is capped by regulation in several jurisdictions. In inbound operations it counts callers who hang up while waiting. Automated agents change the shape of the problem without removing it.

In detail

The two senses share a name and little else. Outbound abandonment happens when a dialler places more calls than it has capacity to handle, so an answered call has nobody to connect to. Inbound abandonment happens when the caller gives up in a queue. The first is caused by over-dialling, the second by under-staffing, and they are measured and fixed differently.

The outbound sense is regulated because the recipient experience is a silent or dead call. Rules in several jurisdictions cap the permitted abandonment percentage over a defined measurement period and require an informative recorded message within a short window when a call is abandoned. Predictive diallers must therefore pace against the cap, not merely against available capacity.

AI agents change the calculus in one direction and add a new failure mode in the other. Because an agent is available the instant a call connects, classic outbound abandonment from over-dialling largely disappears. But a new equivalent appears: calls where the agent connects and then fails — a provider outage, an unhandled request, a caller who hangs up on realising it is automated. Tracking that as its own category is more useful than folding it into a legacy metric.

Back to the glossary

All 53 glossary terms